Month: April 2011

Art vs The Church

Richard Littledale asks an interesting question on his blog about this piece of art by Alfonso Ossorio.  He wanted to know “How would you feel looking at this image on a Sunday”?  As you can see, this is a mural placed behind the altar in a church.  As the Eucharist is celebrated this image dominates the scene.  Personally, I love it.  It conveys such vivid imagery and deep theological meaning.  I wonder if I could find a good quality image of it for use on Easter Sunday Morning.

In the past I have seen the problems that a piece of art like this can cause.  The stained glass window at a new-build church I have sporadically attended in the past caused major controversy when the church was first opened.  It is still talked about whenever I visit.  What was the major heresy that the person who placed these pieces of coloured glass together had committed?  Firstly, the glass used was in modern vivid colours.  This in itself could no doubt be over looked but this is just the first of the window’s crimes.  The image itself depicted Jesus as a dark-haired, distinctly “foreign” looking gentleman.  Shocking I know!  To compound this, the Sacred Heart wasn’t not shaped like a Valentine card, it was shaped like a…. heart.  Unbelievable!!  Jesus sacred heart is shaped like an organ that pumps blood around the human body?  Shocking!! 

Many people do not want to be challenged by their faith, they seek to be comforted by it.  A faith that challenges demands action and possibly even change.  For many people this brings feelings of insecurity and this can be a troubling experience.

Having discussed the window, it would seem that people would have been much happier with a stained glass window depicting a nice blonde King Arthur holding a valentine’s card.  These things highlight that there is a disconnect between those who control many of our churches the reality of the society in which we serve.  Many of those who are in a position to make decisions about the direction of a church would like to perpetuate the memories of youth.  The church organises village fetes reminiscent of the 1950’s.  We commission art that is in a style of 100-200 years ago.  We seek to create a modern version of Victorian stained glass.  We ask our musicians to write music reminiscent of centuries gone by as it is reminiscent of a shared childhood experience from early in the twentieth century.

So what are the implications of this?  If we don’t allow our artists to create and perform their art within the church they will do it elsewhere.  If we chase everyone out of our churches and into the big wide world we will need to be prepped and ready to turn the lights off in our buildings and lock the door for the last time.

The Prodigal Son | Video

I found this on my desktop – someone sent a link to it on YouTube a while ago.  I can’t for the life of me remember if I posted it at the time.  If not, enjoy.  If I did – enjoy again!!

Rev | The Gospel and Social Change

If you managed to catch the sitcom Rev last year you will have seen Tom Hollander depict the sometimes hilarious and sometimes harrowing reality of inner city ministry.  He has been interviewed in The Guardian about his experiences of vicarage life growing up.  He juxtaposes the stereotypical view of church with the radical experiences of his father:

My own father was a genuine radical and our breakfast table conversation tended to be less about the church roof or the jam tarts for the local fete and more about the gospel as an instrument for real social change or whether my Dad was going to get arrested on his next direct action against an MoD weapons facility (which he usually did, to my acute childhood embarrassment, with a group of Dominican friar mates of his, often all dressed in monastic habits. The shame).